Skip to main content

Blog # 11. Attachments under Prohibition of Benami Propert Tranactions Act, 1988 and Initial Response

Under the provisions of Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988, the attachments are made as per the provisions of Section 24 by an Initiating Officer. 
Who are Initiating Officers ?
As per Section 2(19) of Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988, initiating officer means an Assistant Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner as defined in clause (9A) and (19A) respectively of section 2 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
As per Section 2(9A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 , "Assistant Commissioner" means a person appointed to be an Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax  [or a Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax] under sub-section (1) of section 117;] And As per Section 2(19A) of The Income Tax Act, 1961, "Deputy Commissioner" means a person appointed to be a Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax under sub-section (1) of section 117;
Accordingly, proceedings under The Prohibition of Benami Property Act, 1988 as amended by the present Modi Government can be initiated by an Assistant Commissioner or Deputy Commissioners of Income Tax. After receiving evidences/material against the benamidar or beneficial owner, if the initiating officer has reasons to believe that the case falls within the purview of Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 then :-
( 1 )    Record reasons in writing that any person is a benamidar.
( 2 )    Issue notice u/s 24(1) of the Act to the Benamidar asking as to why the property should not treated as benami property.
( 3 )    Notice to Beneficial Owner as well if his identity is known.
( 4 )    If Initiating officer feels that the person who is in possession of Benami Property may alienate such property, then he may attach such property. Procedure of Attaching such property:-
Step No.1         à Previous Approval from Approving Authority.
Step No. II.  à Pass Provisional Attachment Order attaching such Benami property for a period of maximum of 90 days from the date of issuing notice to benamidar.
( 5 )     Thereafter he makes such inquiries, calls for reports or evidences as he deems fit and taking in to account all the materials, if he opines that the property is benami then he may continue such provisional Attachment beyond a period of 90 days or attaches the property if the same has not been attached before 90 days of issuing notice u/s 24(1) of the Act, after :-
Ø  Taking prior approval of Approving Authority.
Ø  Has to again pass an order continuing the provisional attachment. The same shall continue till the time specified in such order or till the order is passed by the Adjudicating Authority.
Ø  Draw up statement of the case and refers it to the Adjudicating Authority.

Revokes provisional attachment after passing an order in writing after taking approval from Approving Authority if he is satisfied that the transaction

Initial Response to be taken if you receive notice u/s 24(1) of the Act :-
( 1 )    Request Initiating Officer to provide materials against you.
( 2 )    Request for the reasons recorded for initiating the proceedings.

Initial Response to be taken in case of proceedings before the Adjudication Authority :
Request for the Case Statement submitted by Initiating Officer.


Popular posts from this blog

Blog # 26. Concept of Real Income under the Income Tax Act, 1961

  What is Income ? Before understanding the concept of Real Income, it shall be important to go through the the term “Income” and “Real”. Income is defined under S.2(24) of the Income Tax Act, 1961(Hereinafter referred as “the Act”). The definition as provided under the Act is an inclusive definition so as to cover up all the usual as well as unusual items, however it certainly does not define it in a way that we can be said it to be precise. The same can be understood by various Judge Made Laws. The first and the lead amongst them is a Privy Council Judgment in the case of Kamakshya Narain   Singh CIT 11 ITR 513 (PC)         Facts The assesse was a “Raja” gave mining lease and He received payments by way of royalty for coal mines leased out to various lessees. The case of the Assessee was that this royalty income received by the Assessee was nothing but the recoupment of the resources which shall be exhausted by the end of the lease and thus the same was not income bu

Reference to TPO- Law & Important Judgements

Sec 92CA provides that the Assessing Officer (“AO”) may make reference to Transfer Pricing officer (“TPO”) for computation of arm's length price (ALP) of international transaction entered into by assessee if the AO considers necessary and expedient to do so with prior approval of Principal Commissioner or Commissioner. Further, CBDT instruction No. 3/ 2003 made it mandatory for AO to make such reference if the value of international transactions exceeded Rs. 5 crores. Transfer pricing arena has seen many disputes revolving around making reference to TPO and powers/duties of AO and TPO around that. In a recent landmark decision in the case of Tata Consultancy Services Ltd., the Mumbai ITAT held that AO cannot make a reference to the TPO mechanically without applying his mind to the TP report or to any other material or information, despite CBDT Instruction No. 3/2003.The CBDT has recently revised CBDT Instruction No. 3/2003, by issuing  Instruction No. 15/2015 ,  which stated tha

Discussion on purchases held Bogus

Introduction Bombay High Court in Mahalaxmi Cotton Ginning Pressing and Oil Industries v The State of Maharashtra & Others (2012) 51 VST 1 (Bom.) (HC) (SLP dismissed by the Supreme Court) dealing with set off under section 48(5) and 51(7) of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002. Issue before the court was when dealer collects the taxes and does not deposit it in the Government Treasury, can the purchased be entitled to set off of the said taxes. Validity of the provision was challenged. Upholding the validity of the provision the court held that .Section 48(5) uses the expression “actually paid” in to the Government treasury. The words “actually paid” must receive their ordinary and natural meaning. There is no reason for the court to depart from the plain and ordinary meaning of these words when used in the context of section 48(5). To accept the contention that “actually paid…in the Government Treasury” should be read to mean the tax that ought t